Bottom linebbc looking for bj

Added: Kyoko Kincade - Date: 02.11.2021 18:54 - Views: 33464 - Clicks: 3016

Log in for full access to stabroeknews. You can also post comments, and manage your subscription. The crux. In recent columns I have repeatedly indicated my firm opinion that the state of play of US-China relations on global climate issues forms the crux of the negotiating difficulties, which the global community faces. At the moment this is the critical component for arriving at a satisfactory world-wide solution to climate change and global warming.

This should not come as a surprise. And, on a current basis, it is the second worst. Other major current polluters worth noting include India, Indonesia and Brazil. Regrettably, despite its leading role in global atmospheric pollution, the United States did not subscribe to the Kyoto Protocol on global climate change when it was agreed to in The Copenhagen summit, however, was expected to replace or extend the Kyoto Protocol, which is scheduled to expire in Fortunately, President Obama in his election campaign committed his administration, if he won, to full participation in any replacement agreement.

So far, however, despite a Democratic Party majority in both houses of Congress, I can safely report that President Obama has failed to attain a congressional consensus, let alone mandate, to negotiate a replacement agreement for the Kyoto Protocol. Indeed, as I reported in a column the opposition Republican Party had sent a high-level congressional delegation to the climate summit condemning it and charging that there is no convincing scientific evidence to support the claims of climate change and global warming, let alone the role of human activity as Bottom linebbc looking for bj contributing factor to this.

Bottom linebbc looking for bj

The e-mail scandals coming out of the University of East Anglia have added considerable fuel to the controversy in the United States. At the end of the climate summit the hastily brokered last-minute Copenhagen Accord cannot mask the serious failure of the summit.

Bottom linebbc looking for bj

The accord the summit therefore ended with can be best described as a political deal brokered by five nations: Brazil, China, India, South Africa and the United States. This political deal remains to be sold to the remaining participating nations at the conference. At the close of the summit President Obama claimed the global community had achieved a meaningful political deal. It has no track record of trust in regard to fulfilling its global climate obligations, particularly as a very large part of its population and political establishment remains deeply skeptical.

Secondly, while the Kyoto Protocol references global pledges by rich countries to reduce harmful emissions of carbon dioxide CO2 by 80 per cent on the level bythe current US pledge has still not topped four 4 per cent. Thirdly, although the Kyoto Protocol acknowledges the profound difference between developed and developing countries and therefore their very differing roles and obligations in solving the global climate problem, the USA has not yet fully committed to this principle of differential obligations, mainly on of its objections to the presence of Brazil, China and India in the developing countries grouping.

The position taken by China at the climate summit is just as problematic. Its comments on the of the conference underscores some of the recurring concerns I have expressed about China in my recent presentations in these columns.

Bottom linebbc looking for bj

After negotiations both [sic] sides have managed to preserve their bottom line. Those readers who were following the lead-up to the Copenhagen summit would have realized that a legally binding agreement to replace the Kyoto Protocol was beyond its reach. The only possible achievement was indeed a political deal that satisfied the national interests of the key players. Small countries, despite their could not have held a ificant independent influence on global negotiations.

Bottom linebbc looking for bj

email: [email protected] - phone:(506) 100-4351 x 8965

Education, the skills gap and the bottom line